REVIEWER POLICY

Peer Review Process:

The International Journal of Ayurveda & Modern Sciences (IJAMS) follows a strict double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and integrity of published research. Both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the evaluation process.

Selection of Reviewers:

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic qualifications, and experience in relevant fields of Ayurveda, modern medicine, and interdisciplinary research. The editorial board maintains a diverse panel of national and international experts to provide unbiased and constructive feedback.

Reviewer Responsibilities:

• Evaluate the manuscript for originality, scientific validity, and clarity.
• Provide constructive and impartial comments to help improve the quality of the manuscript.
• Maintain confidentiality regarding the manuscript content.
• Declare any potential conflicts of interest before accepting the review invitation.
• Submit the review within the stipulated time frame.

Review Criteria:

Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:

• Relevance and scope of the research.
• Methodological rigor and accuracy.
• Ethical compliance and proper citation of sources.
• Clarity of presentation, structure, and writing style.
• Contribution to existing knowledge in the field of Ayurveda and modern sciences.

Editorial Decision:

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editorial team makes the final decision to accept, request revisions, or reject the manuscript. The aim is to ensure that published articles meet high standards of scientific quality and integrity.